No More Incumbents Presidential Race

Presidential Race Perspective and Reviews

May 3rd, 2007

Tonite’s Republican Debate

Earlier tonite, the first installment of the Republican debates took place. How befitting that the candidates debated in the shadow of Reagan’s Air Force One, the aircraft hanging suspended in the library’s pavilion. After all, it’s every Republicans’ wet dream to be near the cockpit of something named after Ronald Reagan.

From the very begining the candidates appeared to have their heads so far up the GOPs ass that they were finding Mark Foley’s Blackberry. With transparent bravado the group of painfully sexually frustrated men trumpeted their bellicosity, desperately compensating for the utter lack of vision and war credentials–excepting McCain. From the major contenders to virtual unknowns, each and every one of them nebulously spoke of the “City on the Hill” passage–one of the most exploited speeches among campianging conservatives–in their description of America. The phrase was first invoked by Puritan leader John Winthrop who used it in a sermon to Massachusetts Bay Colonists. Its merits can be found in American Exceptionalism: the idea that Americans are extordinary people born of exceptional circumstances, unless, of course, they happen to be a Native American. As you can imagine this idea had virtually no effect on future american presidents, especially Ronald Reagan. While seemingly innocous in theory, it is minatory in application. For this theory to prevail in foreign policy it must be executed with the upmost caution, so as to avoid such disasters as Manacheaism which then leads to “clash of civilizations.” The biggest misuse of this theory, without question, was the invasion of Iraq.

When it came to proverbial “hot button” issues such as abortion the responses were virtually unanimous, with Guiliani obfucasting just enough to appease civil libertarians while not alienating conservatives.  

“It would be OK to repeal it. It would be OK also if a strict constructionist viewed it as precedent,” said the former New York city mayor, who has a record of supporting abortion rights.

Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo, the xenophobic blowhard and right wingiest of the right-wingers, went so far as to cite dead fetuses. He’s certainly not fishing for Planned Parenthood endorsements. Happy Cinco De Mayo! Oops, I mean May 5th. He’s about as popular in Miami as Janet Reno.

When asked if whether they didn’t believe in evolution, Kansas Senator Sam Brownback, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo raised their hands like good brainwashed catholic schoolchildren. Not a good night to be enlightened.

Not surprisingly, when it came to Iraq there wasn’t an iota of dissent. One by one each of the ductile sycophants continues paying lipservice to the Bush Adminsitartion. It should be noted, however, that potential Republican candidate Sen. Chuck Hagel has vehemently opposed the troop surge and in fact voted in support of withdrawl in the now vetoed war legislation. Naturally, he was missing. On a lighter note, you’re probably to sloshed to do the math but Ronald Reagan was invoked a total of 19 times, which is slightly less the amount of times he’s invoked by Mitt Romney during sexual intercourse.

In summation, with the exception of a few protests regarding pork barrel legislation the Republican Presidential Candidates proved that they are nothing more than “politics as usual,” eternally married to the staus quo.

Don't Take Our Word For it, For More Information Google Search is Available

Google
 
February 26th, 2007

Joe Biden for President (If the Media will let him)

Pardon the hackneyed slogan, but there’s nothing more decisive and succinct to say in regards to who should occupy the White House for the next four years. Now, Joe Biden has been mired in controversy–unduly and wrongfully–after some comments of his regarding Barak Obama’s race were sadly taken out of context, not surprisingly, by political correctness. Consequently, one of the sharpest and most presidential candidates is being forced to squander all-important media time on making pathetic apologies in leu of doing what he does best, like offering real and imaginative solutions to one of the most pressing issues of our time: who or what killed Anna Nicole Smith?

Joe Biden certainly isn’t the first viable and respectable candidate to be judged unfairly. Can anyone say “The Scream??” In a moment of regrettable exuberance, Howard Dean celebrated his fourth place victory in the 2004 Iowa caucus with an ear-piercing “yee-haw,” subsequently, reducing the sincerest (only) opponent of the Iraqi War to a late-night casualty. Okay, I’m not saying that as a comedian I wasn’t ripping into Howard Dean like it was going out of fashion; but as a citizen I wasn’t too jocular. How can someone ahead by twenty points in the polls suddenly fizzle out? Perhaps it was a pre-emptive move by the giant media enterprises to strike Howard before he could strike them. “We’re going to break up the giant enterprises,” said Howard Dean in an interview with Chris Matthews.

Then, during the week leading up to the New Hampshire primary, the media obsessed about Dean’s “bizarre” rally incident, adding “un-presidential” and “emotionally unstable” to its descriptions of the governor. That Howard yelped in an explosive manner (as if there’s any other way to yelp) had little to do with the public’s perception of him as presidential, I think. Howard Dean fell because he advocated media divestment, a policy that would hold media responsible not to shareholders, but to the public where it belongs.

By mentioning Howard Dean I’m not suggesting that his maverick attitude toward corporate power in any way relates to Joe Biden’s recent brainfart (which is exactly what it was); however, I am merely pointing out how invidious the media can be toward presidential candidates. I don’t think Biden’s “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy” remark is equivalent to saying, “We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over all these years either,” which were Trent Lott’s segregationist remarks at Strom Thurmond’s 300th birthday celebration. To those of you who say that I’m favoring implicit racism or ‘soft bigotry’ over explicit racism, go and masticate the excessively hot fascia of an excessively hot gallus domesticus:) But seriously, as a misanthrope I hate mankind on a whole. As far as the articulate, bright and clean gaffe, I sincerely don’t think he was discounting the verbal prowess of some of the past black candidates (i.e., Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton), but rather making a clear-cut distinction between lofty and genuine speech that’s designed to inform, from merely incendiary demagoguery that’s designed to inflame.

Here’s what the media should but isn’t covering about Joe Biden (courtesy of his webpage):

A Five Point Plan for Iraq

1. Establish One Iraq, with Three Regions

Federalize Iraq in accordance with its constitution by establishing three largely autonomous regions - Shiite, Sunni and Kurd — with a strong but limited central government in Baghdad
Put the central government in charge of truly common interests: border defense, foreign policy, oil production and revenues
Form regional governments — Kurd, Sunni and Shiite — responsible for administering their own regions

2. Share Oil Revenues
Gain agreement for the federal solution from the Sunni Arabs by guaranteeing them 20 percent of all present and future oil revenues — an amount roughly proportional to their size — which would make their region economically viable
Empower the central government to set national oil policy and distribute the revenues, which would attract needed foreign investment and reinforce each community’s interest in keeping Iraq intact and protecting the oil infrastructure

3. Convene International Conference, Enforce Regional Non-Aggression Pact
Convene with the U.N. a regional security conference where Iraq’s neighbors, including Iran, pledge to support Iraq’s power sharing agreement and respect Iraq’s borders
Engage Iraq’s neighbors directly to overcome their suspicions and focus their efforts on stabilizing Iraq, not undermining it
Create a standing Contact Group, to include the major powers, that would engage Iraq’s neighbors and enforce their commitments

4. Responsibly Drawdown US Troops
Direct U.S. military commanders to develop a plan to withdraw and re-deploy almost all U.S. forces from Iraq by the end of 2007
Maintain in or near Iraq a small residual force — perhaps 20,000 troops — to strike any concentration of terrorists, help keep Iraq’s neighbors honest and train its security forces

5. Increase Reconstruction Assistance and Create a Jobs Program
Provide more reconstruction assistance, conditioned on the protection of minority and women’s rights and the establishment of a jobs program to give Iraqi youth an alternative to the militia and criminal gangs
Insist that other countries take the lead in funding reconstruction by making good on old commitments and providing new ones — especially the oil-rich Arab Gulf countries

Afghanistan and Darfur

If we should be surging forces anywhere, it is to Afghanistan. That country is not lost, but it is on the brink of a major comeback by the Taliban, Al Qaeada, warlords and drug traffickers. Our necessary investment in blood and treasure risks being squandered — we need an infusion of military and economic assistance and a plan to wean that country away from drugs.
This administration rightly called what’s going on in Darfur geneocide, but it has failed to match its words with deeds. Joe Biden has been calling for NATO to declare and police a “No Fly Zone” over Darfur; for an international peacekeeping mission we should impose if Khartoum says no; and serious sanctions against the regime which is aiding and abetting the slaughter of innocents.

Energy

Joe Biden believes that domestic energy policy is at the center of our foreign policy and economic policy. Most of the world’s oil is concentrated in nations that are either hostile to American interests or vulnerable to political upheaval and terrorism. Our oil dependence undercuts the advance of freedom and limits our options and influence around the world because oil rich countries pursuing policies we oppose can stand up to us and undermine the resolve of our allies. Profits from the sale of oil help fuel the fundamentalism we are fighting. High energy prices hurt business’ bottom line.
Joe Biden’s first priority is energy security. He believes we can strengthen security by reducing our oil consumption by increasing fuel efficiency, transitioning to farm-grown fuels like ethanol and biodiesel, and expanding the use of renewable energy. But we cannot stop there. Joe Biden would make a substantial national commitment by dramatically increasing investment in energy and climate change research and technology so that that United States becomes the world leader in developing and exporting alternative energy.

Don't Take Our Word For it, For More Information Google Search is Available

Google
 
|